Autotelic Text: A Brief Note

The New Critical notion of the autotelic text as self-contained and independent of the author, genre or historical context, was associated with Arnold’s insistence on objectivity and Eliot’s on impersonality. Such a text that contains meaning within itself is humanist and renders itself to close reading, based on formal devices such as irony, ambiguity, paradox, rhythm or syntax, as explained by William Empson (The Seven Types of Ambiguity, 1930),-FR Leavis (articles in Scrutiny), Cleanth Brooks (“Language of Paradox”), and so on. Having developed in the US and UK, this notion of the autotelic text influenced the modernists and was rejected in the 1950s by the structuralists in their focus on larger structures that contain the text.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s